Concentrated Poverty

The Concentrated Poverty indicator measures the percentage of the population that falls below the federal poverty line threshold, which is updated annually and reported in the U.S. Census. Poverty strongly influences well-being, at the individual level. Individuals who experience poverty, especially consistently throughout their life-course, are at a greater risk of unemployment, obesity, and a host of other chronic illnesses. Furthermore, those who grow up in high poverty neighborhoods are less likely to escape from poverty, especially if they live in low-income neighborhoods during adolescence, and into adulthood. Hence, the effect of place-based poverty is also consequential. As the distribution of poverty and affluence has become more spatially isolated throughout the United States, social and financial capital has also become more concentrated, which impedes the ability for many poor Americans, to access ladders of opportunity. For example, neighborhoods with higher rates of poverty have high demand for expensive social services, which often significantly underserve local residents. Also, high poverty neighborhoods typically have higher preventable deaths, lower life expectancies, more environmental hazards, and poor quality school systems. Furthermore, freeways and other busy roadways often run through low-income neighborhoods resulting in disproportionately higher exposure to noise and air pollution. Data for this indicator is available from the U.S. Census.

Neighborhoodsort descending Indicator Value Rank
Acipco-Finley 24.3% -
Airport Highlands 15.6% -
Apple Valley 17.2% -
Arlington - West End 36.1% -
Belview Heights 19.6% -
Bridlewood 26.0% -
Brown Springs 31.7% -
Brownsville Heights 16.1% -
Brummitt Heights 6.1% -
Bush Hills 19.6% -
Central City 31.7% -
Central Park 35.5% -
Central Pratt 31.8% -
College Hills 28.9% -
Collegeville 67.1% -
Crestline 11.1% -
Crestwood North 14.0% -
Crestwood South 6.2% -
Dolomite 16.4% -
Druid Hills 28.7% -
East Avondale 29.4% -
East Birmingham 52.5% -
East Brownville 33.8% -
East Lake 26.2% -
East Thomas 25.1% -
Eastwood 27.2% -
Echo Highlands 20.9% -
Enon Ridge 34.0% -
Ensley 43.3% -
Ensley Highlands 32.1% -
Evergreen 34.2% -
Fairmont 49.1% -
Fairview 33.3% -
Five Points South 33.4% -
Forest Park 26.2% -
Fountain Heights 47.8% -
Garden Highlands 39.6% -
Gate City 82.8% -
Germania Park 32.4% -
Glen Iris 32.4% -
Grasselli Heights 34.8% -
Graymont 65.6% -
Green Acres 13.7% -
Harriman Park 57.2% -
Highland Park 19.1% -
Hillman 18.3% -
Hillman Park 33.7% -
Hooper City 25.9% -
Huffman 18.0% -
Industrial Center 43.3% -
Inglenook 42.6% -
Jones Valley 21.1% -
Killough Springs 22.7% -
Kingston 50.7% -
Liberty Highlands 20.5% -
Maple Grove 25.1% -
Mason City 47.7% -
North Avondale 66.2% -
North Birmingham 23.6% -
North East Lake 42.2% -
North Pratt 17.1% -
North Titusville 53.0% -
Norwood 54.2% -
Oak Ridge 16.2% -
Oak Ridge Park 39.8% -
Oakwood Place 33.9% -
Overton 10.6% -
Oxmoor 16.2% -
Penfield Park 25.2% -
Pine Knoll Vista 6.1% -
Powderly 37.5% -
Redmont Park 9.6% -
Riley 25.2% -
Rising - West Princeton 53.3% -
Roebuck 23.9% -
Roebuck Springs 9.7% -
Roosevelt 25.7% -
Sandusky 16.8% -
Sherman Heights 21.1% -
Smithfield 46.7% -
Smithfield Estates 13.7% -
South East Lake 36.3% -
South Pratt 13.6% -
South Titusville 37.1% -
South Woodlawn 34.0% -
Southside 83.9% -
Spring Lake 10.4% -
Sun Valley 24.7% -
Tarpley City 40.4% -
Thomas 24.3% -
Tuxedo 60.7% -
Wahouma 43.3% -
West Brownville 41.6% -
West End Manor 28.9% -
West Goldwire 40.3% -
Woodland Park 15.3% -
Woodlawn 36.5% -
Wylam 37.7% -
Zion City 46.0% -

Key Citations:
1. Williams, DR, Collins, C. Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Reports. 2001; 116: 404-416.
2. Wilson, WJ. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
3. Lannin, DR, Matthews, HF, Mitchell, J, Swanson, FH, Edwards, MS. Influence of Socioeconomic and Cultural Factors on Racial Differences in Late-stage Presentation of Breast Cancer. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998; 279(22): 1801-1807.