Age of Housing

The Age of Housing indicator measures the proportion of neighborhood housing built before 1980. Tenured housing, before 1980, is more likely to be less energy efficient, and have environmental toxins such as asbestos and lead-based paint. Except in areas that have gentrified or are undergoing revitalization with significant housing rehabilitation, homes built before 1980 also tend to be a significant predictor of housing inadequacy (i.e., housing with moderate or severe housing hazards), which includes problems such as water leaks, roof problems, holes in walls, etc. This can increase exposure to mold, mites, and other allergens. The age of a structure is also a significant predictor of higher household lead dust levels and cockroach allergens, which play an important role in the development and exacerbation of respiratory conditions. Studies show that while more institutional factors, such as segregation and income inequalities are difficult to combat, housing interventions can be a more effective and efficient method to address health and economic outcomes. Listed in the Housing domain, the Age of Housing indicator also impacts the Economic Health, Health Systems and Public Safety, and Educational Opportunities domains. It is considered an “inverse” measure in that, the higher the proportion of older housing in a neighborhood, the higher the negative impact on community health. Data on when housing was built is available from the U.S. Census.

Neighborhood Indicator Value Ranksort descending
Oxmoor 11.9% 1
Overton 12.7% 2
Central City 42.1% 3
Tuxedo 44.1% 4
Echo Highlands 44.5% 5
North Pratt 51.5% 6
Sandusky 54.4% 7
Apple Valley 54.8% 8
Bridlewood 55.4% 9
Liberty Highlands 60.2% 10
Smithfield Estates 60.5% 11
Penfield Park 64.6% 12
Maple Grove 64.9% 13
Glen Iris 65.1% 14
Dolomite 66.7% 15
South Woodlawn 69.3% 16
Five Points South 69.4% 17
Fountain Heights 70.5% 18
Mason City 70.5% 18
Hillman Park 70.6% 20
Zion City 71.9% 21
Eastwood 72.0% 22
Killough Springs 72.0% 22
East Brownville 72.2% 24
North Birmingham 72.4% 25
Spring Lake 74.0% 26
Pine Knoll Vista 74.6% 27
East Lake 74.6% 27
Brummitt Heights 74.6% 27
Acipco-Finley 74.7% 30
Woodlawn 77.1% 31
Southside 77.6% 32
Sun Valley 77.7% 33
Forest Park 78.1% 34
Thomas 79.1% 35
West Brownville 79.1% 35
Ensley 79.1% 35
Crestline 79.9% 38
Highland Park 81.2% 39
Huffman 81.3% 40
South East Lake 81.3% 40
Arlington - West End 81.3% 40
Rising - West Princeton 82.3% 43
Sherman Heights 82.3% 43
North Titusville 82.8% 45
East Avondale 83.0% 46
Redmont Park 83.0% 46
Oak Ridge Park 83.2% 48
Garden Highlands 83.8% 49
Evergreen 84.3% 50
Crestwood South 84.8% 51
Oak Ridge 85.6% 52
Central Park 85.7% 53
West Goldwire 85.7% 53
Druid Hills 85.7% 53
Hillman 85.9% 56
East Birmingham 86.0% 57
South Titusville 86.3% 58
South Pratt 86.4% 59
North East Lake 86.8% 60
Germania Park 87.0% 61
West End Manor 87.6% 62
Wylam 87.6% 62
Central Pratt 87.7% 64
North Avondale 87.8% 65
Tarpley City 87.8% 65
Oakwood Place 88.1% 67
Belview Heights 88.7% 68
Riley 88.7% 68
Green Acres 89.0% 70
Wahouma 89.3% 71
Roosevelt 89.5% 72
Woodland Park 89.5% 72
Enon Ridge 89.6% 74
East Thomas 89.7% 75
Smithfield 90.2% 76
Brown Springs 90.2% 76
Roebuck 90.5% 78
Norwood 90.5% 78
Crestwood North 90.5% 78
Hooper City 90.7% 81
Gate City 90.7% 81
Powderly 90.9% 83
Fairview 91.6% 84
Grasselli Heights 91.9% 85
Ensley Highlands 92.3% 86
Fairmont 92.6% 87
Bush Hills 92.7% 88
Jones Valley 92.9% 89
Roebuck Springs 93.1% 90
Brownsville Heights 93.3% 91
Airport Highlands 93.7% 92
Industrial Center 94.1% 93
Harriman Park 94.2% 94
Graymont 94.3% 95
Inglenook 94.3% 95
Kingston 95.8% 97
Collegeville 96.4% 98
College Hills 97.0% 99

Key Citations:
1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Social Determinants of Health. Published 2011. Accessed December 27, 2013. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2011/rwjf70451.
2. Elliott L, Arbes S, Harvey ES, Lee RC, Salo PM, Cohn RD, London SJ, Zeldin DC. Dust Weight and Asthma Prevalence in the National Survey of Lead and Allergens in Housing (NSLAH). Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115(2): 215–220. Published online 2006 November 7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9412 PMCID: PMC1817708.
3. Cohn RD, Arbes SJ, Jaramillo R, Reid, LH, Zeldin, DC. 2006. National Prevalence and Exposure Risk for Cockroach Allergen in U.S. Households. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114(4): 522–526. Published online 2005 November 15. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8561.
4. Lefebvre S, Montgomery P, Michel I, Warren C, Larose T, Kauppi C. The role of public health inspectors in maintaining housing in northern and rural communities: recommendations to support public health practice. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;103(2):84-9.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Healthy Housing Reference Manual. 2006. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nceh/publication/books/housing/housing.htm
6. National Center for Healthy Housing. Housing Interventions and Health: A Review of the Evidence. 2009. Accessed December 27, 2012. Available at: www.nchh.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=2lvaEDNBldU%3d%tabid=229.