Proximity to Brownfield Sites

The Proximity to Brownfield Sites indicator measures the share of a neighborhood population located in close proximity (500ft.) to a Brownfield. From an environmental hazards standpoint, Brownfields potentially have biological, physical, or chemical environmental dangers as a result of site contamination, groundwater impacts, surface runoff, migration of contaminants, or wastes dumped on site. According to the EPA, Brownfields may also have broader health impacts to the community, including safety issues ranging from abandoned or dilapidated buildings, compromised infrastructure and equipment, contamination from toxic substances, to social and economic factors such as reduced property values and tax base as a result of blight, crime, and vagrancy issues. Brownfields data is available from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Targeted Brownfields Assessment program and Alabama Department of Environmental Management Cleanup Voluntary Cleanup Program. Listed under the Environmental Hazards domain, this indicator is also linked to the Neighborhood Characteristics, Social Cohesion, Economic Health, and Health Systems and Public Safety domains. It is considered an “inverse” measure, i.e., the higher the share of the neighborhood located close to a Brownfield site, the higher the negative impact on the neighborhood.

Neighborhoodsort descending Indicator Value Rank
Acipco-Finley 3.2% 81
Airport Highlands 0.0% 1
Apple Valley 0.0% 1
Arlington - West End 0.0% 1
Belview Heights 0.0% 1
Bridlewood 0.0% 1
Brown Springs 0.0% 1
Brownsville Heights 0.0% 1
Brummitt Heights 0.0% 1
Bush Hills 0.0% 1
Central City 1.9% 78
Central Park 0.0% 1
Central Pratt 0.0% 1
College Hills 3.2% 81
Collegeville 52.6% 99
Crestline 0.0% 1
Crestwood North 0.0% 1
Crestwood South 0.0% 1
Dolomite 4.7% 85
Druid Hills 0.0% 1
East Avondale 30.8% 95
East Birmingham 0.0% 1
East Brownville 0.0% 1
East Lake 0.0% 1
East Thomas 15.5% 94
Eastwood 0.0% 1
Echo Highlands 0.0% 1
Enon Ridge 0.0% 1
Ensley 0.7% 77
Ensley Highlands 0.0% 1
Evergreen 8.8% 90
Fairmont 31.3% 96
Fairview 0.0% 1
Five Points South 0.0% 1
Forest Park 12.9% 92
Fountain Heights 14.8% 93
Garden Highlands 0.0% 1
Gate City 0.0% 1
Germania Park 0.0% 1
Glen Iris 5.5% 86
Grasselli Heights 0.0% 1
Graymont 0.1% 74
Green Acres 0.0% 1
Harriman Park 0.0% 1
Highland Park 0.0% 1
Hillman 0.0% 1
Hillman Park 0.0% 1
Hooper City 0.0% 1
Huffman 0.0% 1
Industrial Center 0.0% 1
Inglenook 2.2% 80
Jones Valley 0.0% 1
Killough Springs 0.0% 1
Kingston 0.0% 1
Liberty Highlands 0.0% 1
Maple Grove 0.0% 1
Mason City 0.0% 1
North Avondale 0.0% 1
North Birmingham 11.3% 91
North East Lake 7.8% 89
North Pratt 0.0% 1
North Titusville 3.3% 83
Norwood 2.1% 79
Oak Ridge 0.0% 1
Oak Ridge Park 0.0% 1
Oakwood Place 0.0% 1
Overton 0.0% 1
Oxmoor 0.0% 1
Penfield Park 0.0% 1
Pine Knoll Vista 0.0% 1
Powderly 6.3% 87
Redmont Park 0.0% 1
Riley 7.7% 88
Rising - West Princeton 0.0% 1
Roebuck 0.0% 1
Roebuck Springs 0.0% 1
Roosevelt 0.0% 1
Sandusky 0.0% 1
Sherman Heights 0.0% 1
Smithfield 31.4% 97
Smithfield Estates 0.0% 1
South East Lake 0.0% 1
South Pratt 0.0% 1
South Titusville 0.0% 1
South Woodlawn 0.0% 1
Southside 0.0% 1
Spring Lake 0.0% 1
Sun Valley 0.0% 1
Tarpley City 0.0% 1
Thomas 0.0% 1
Tuxedo 32.7% 98
Wahouma 4.6% 84
West Brownville 0.0% 1
West End Manor 0.0% 1
West Goldwire 0.0% 1
Woodland Park 0.0% 1
Woodlawn 0.5% 76
Wylam 0.1% 74
Zion City 0.0% 1

Key Citations:
1. Litt JS, Burke TA. (2002) Uncovering the historic environmental hazards of urban brownfields. J Urban Health. 2002 Dec; 79(4):464-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12468667
2. California Environmental Protection Agency (2013), California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool, Version 1 (CalEnviroScreen 1.0): Guidance and Screening Tool. http://oehha.ca.gov/ej/pdf/042313CalEnviroScreen1.pdf.
3. California Environmental Protection Agency (2014), Draft Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool: Version 2.0 (CalEnviroScreen 2.0). Information on Version 2. http://oehha.ca.gov/ej/ces2.html