Food Desert

USDA defines a “food desert” as urban neighborhoods and rural towns without ready access to fresh, healthy, and affordable food. The HCI Food Desert indicator measures the proportion of urban neighborhoods more than a mile away from affordable, healthy foods (rural neighborhoods are measured at a 10-miles mark). Instead of supermarkets and grocery stores, these communities may have no food access or are served only by fast food restaurants and convenience stores that offer few healthy, affordable food options. Food deserts tend to exist in areas that are lower-income, inner-city, or rural, where there are few supermarkets, and access to healthy food is a challenge. Lack of access to healthy foods is a risk factor for health outcomes such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. There is an interconnected relationship between food deserts and limited access to supermarkets in lower-income, minority communities, and one in five food stamps recipients lives in a neighborhood without a grocery store. Access to supermarkets is among the strongest behavioral correlates related to health and the built environment. Found under the Neighborhood Characteristics domain, the Food Desert indicator is also connected to the Economic Health, Educational Opportunities, Health Systems and Public Safety, and Social Cohesion domains. Data is available at the Census tract level from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and is provided in a dichotomous fashion, i.e., 0=no food desert, 1=food desert. This indicator is an “inverse” measure as the higher the number, the higher the proportion of the neighborhood considered a food desert, and the higher the negative impact on community health.

Neighborhood Indicator Value Ranksort descending
Redmont Park 10.5% 1
Overton 17.7% 2
Dolomite 20.0% 3
Highland Park 27.3% 4
Crestwood South 30.0% 5
South Titusville 37.5% 6
Oxmoor 38.5% 7
North Titusville 40.0% 8
Crestline 41.7% 9
Spring Lake 41.7% 9
Hooper City 42.9% 11
Echo Highlands 46.2% 12
Roebuck Springs 50.0% 13
Smithfield 50.0% 13
Forest Park 50.0% 13
Apple Valley 50.0% 13
Liberty Highlands 50.0% 13
Huffman 54.6% 18
Southside 55.6% 19
Wahouma 57.1% 20
Crestwood North 57.1% 20
Oak Ridge Park 60.0% 22
East Lake 62.5% 23
West Goldwire 66.7% 24
Fairmont 66.7% 24
Woodland Park 66.7% 24
East Avondale 66.7% 24
Garden Highlands 66.7% 24
Pine Knoll Vista 66.7% 24
Glen Iris 66.7% 24
Five Points South 68.4% 31
Sherman Heights 69.2% 32
Fountain Heights 70.0% 33
Mason City 71.4% 34
Eastwood 71.4% 34
Smithfield Estates 71.4% 34
Killough Springs 71.4% 34
College Hills 75.0% 38
Gate City 75.0% 38
Bridlewood 75.0% 38
Maple Grove 75.0% 38
South East Lake 76.9% 42
Graymont 77.8% 43
Tarpley City 80.0% 44
Green Acres 80.0% 44
Roebuck 80.0% 44
North East Lake 81.8% 47
Arlington - West End 81.8% 47
Riley 83.3% 49
South Woodlawn 83.3% 49
Sun Valley 83.3% 49
East Thomas 85.7% 52
North Pratt 85.7% 52
Woodlawn 85.7% 52
Powderly 88.9% 55
Grasselli Heights 100.0% 56
Brummitt Heights 100.0% 56
North Avondale 100.0% 56
Rising - West Princeton 100.0% 56
Thomas 100.0% 56
Bush Hills 100.0% 56
North Birmingham 100.0% 56
Tuxedo 100.0% 56
Central City 100.0% 56
Enon Ridge 100.0% 56
Harriman Park 100.0% 56
Central Park 100.0% 56
Ensley 100.0% 56
Roosevelt 100.0% 56
West Brownville 100.0% 56
Central Pratt 100.0% 56
Ensley Highlands 100.0% 56
Hillman 100.0% 56
Sandusky 100.0% 56
West End Manor 100.0% 56
Evergreen 100.0% 56
Hillman Park 100.0% 56
Norwood 100.0% 56
Collegeville 100.0% 56
Oak Ridge 100.0% 56
Fairview 100.0% 56
Acipco-Finley 100.0% 56
Industrial Center 100.0% 56
Oakwood Place 100.0% 56
Airport Highlands 100.0% 56
Wylam 100.0% 56
Inglenook 100.0% 56
South Pratt 100.0% 56
Zion City 100.0% 56
Jones Valley 100.0% 56
Druid Hills 100.0% 56
Penfield Park 100.0% 56
Belview Heights 100.0% 56
East Birmingham 100.0% 56
Kingston 100.0% 56
East Brownville 100.0% 56
Germania Park 100.0% 56
Brown Springs 100.0% 56
Brownsville Heights 100.0% 56

Key Citations:
1. Flournoy, Rebecca. “Healthy Food Healthy Communities, Promising Strategies to Improve Access to Fresh, Healthy Food and Transform Communities” (2011). PolicyLink.
2. NCHH. “Housing Interventions at the Neighborhood Level and Health: A Review of the Evidence” National Center for Healthy Housing. 2010.
3. Lovasi, Gina S., et al. “Built Environments and Obesity in Disadvantaged Populations” (2009). Epidemiologic Reviews, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
4. Whitacre, Paula, et al. “The Public Health Effects of Food Deserts: Workshop Summary” (2009). National Academy of Sciences.