Land Use Mix

The Land Use Mix indicator measures the average neighborhood-level diversity of destinations based on the mix of eight different employment types (office, retail, industrial, service, entertainment, education, health, and public sector). Though results from studies have varied, recent reports have consistently found positive associations “between walking for transportation and density, distance to nonresidential destinations, and land use mix." Having a mixed of land uses within a neighborhood has been linked to increased physical activity and improve public health. Conversely, a lack of land use mix can contribute lower physical activity, which in turn can lead to increased risk for heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, certain cancers, stroke, sleep apnea, osteoarthritis and other diseases. For example, studies have found that “residents from communities with higher density, greater connectivity, and more land use mix report higher rates of walking/cycling for utilitarian purposes than low-density, poorly connected, and single land use neighborhoods” even after accounting for socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. The Land Use Mix indicator is derive from Environmental Protection Agency Smart Location Database, InfoGroup, Inc. and the City of Birmingham existing land use.

Neighborhood Indicator Value Ranksort descending
North Birmingham 0.8 1
Roebuck 0.8 1
Tuxedo 0.8 1
Roebuck Springs 0.8 1
Ensley 0.8 1
Smithfield 0.8 1
Southside 0.8 1
Spring Lake 0.8 1
Riley 0.7 9
North Avondale 0.7 9
Rising - West Princeton 0.7 9
Thomas 0.7 9
Bush Hills 0.7 9
Green Acres 0.7 9
Central City 0.7 9
North East Lake 0.7 9
Central Park 0.7 9
Roosevelt 0.7 9
Ensley Highlands 0.7 9
North Titusville 0.7 9
Norwood 0.7 9
Hooper City 0.7 9
Acipco-Finley 0.7 9
Woodlawn 0.7 9
Oakwood Place 0.7 9
South East Lake 0.7 9
Wylam 0.7 9
Forest Park 0.7 9
Overton 0.7 9
Jones Valley 0.7 9
Oxmoor 0.7 9
Killough Springs 0.7 9
Belview Heights 0.7 9
Kingston 0.7 9
Brown Springs 0.7 9
East Lake 0.7 9
Glen Iris 0.7 9
Redmont Park 0.7 9
East Thomas 0.6 39
Eastwood 0.6 39
Graymont 0.6 39
Echo Highlands 0.6 39
Harriman Park 0.6 39
Wahouma 0.6 39
North Pratt 0.6 39
West End Manor 0.6 39
College Hills 0.6 39
Fairmont 0.6 39
Woodland Park 0.6 39
Crestline 0.6 39
Fairview 0.6 39
Huffman 0.6 39
Oak Ridge Park 0.6 39
Smithfield Estates 0.6 39
Five Points South 0.6 39
Industrial Center 0.6 39
Fountain Heights 0.6 39
Arlington - West End 0.6 39
East Avondale 0.6 39
Garden Highlands 0.6 39
Gate City 0.6 39
Liberty Highlands 0.6 39
Powderly 0.6 39
Mason City 0.5 64
Highland Park 0.5 64
Sandusky 0.5 64
Sherman Heights 0.5 64
Oak Ridge 0.5 64
Crestwood North 0.5 64
Inglenook 0.5 64
Dolomite 0.5 64
Druid Hills 0.5 64
South Woodlawn 0.5 64
Bridlewood 0.5 64
Germania Park 0.5 64
Central Pratt 0.4 76
Hillman 0.4 76
Collegeville 0.4 76
Airport Highlands 0.4 76
Crestwood South 0.4 76
Penfield Park 0.4 76
East Brownville 0.4 76
Enon Ridge 0.3 83
West Brownville 0.3 83
West Goldwire 0.3 83
South Titusville 0.3 83
East Birmingham 0.3 83
Sun Valley 0.3 83
Brownsville Heights 0.3 83
Grasselli Heights 0.2 90
Evergreen 0.2 90
Tarpley City 0.1 92
South Pratt 0.1 92
Brummitt Heights 0 94
Hillman Park 0 94
Apple Valley 0 94
Zion City 0 94
Pine Knoll Vista 0 94
Maple Grove 0 94

Key Citations:
1. Saelens BE, Handy SL. Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2008;40:S550-S566. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921187/.
2. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2003;25:80-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12704009.