Age of Housing

The Age of Housing indicator measures the proportion of neighborhood housing built before 1980. Tenured housing, before 1980, is more likely to be less energy efficient, and have environmental toxins such as asbestos and lead-based paint. Except in areas that have gentrified or are undergoing revitalization with significant housing rehabilitation, homes built before 1980 also tend to be a significant predictor of housing inadequacy (i.e., housing with moderate or severe housing hazards), which includes problems such as water leaks, roof problems, holes in walls, etc. This can increase exposure to mold, mites, and other allergens. The age of a structure is also a significant predictor of higher household lead dust levels and cockroach allergens, which play an important role in the development and exacerbation of respiratory conditions. Studies show that while more institutional factors, such as segregation and income inequalities are difficult to combat, housing interventions can be a more effective and efficient method to address health and economic outcomes. Listed in the Housing domain, the Age of Housing indicator also impacts the Economic Health, Health Systems and Public Safety, and Educational Opportunities domains. It is considered an “inverse” measure in that, the higher the proportion of older housing in a neighborhood, the higher the negative impact on community health. Data on when housing was built is available from the U.S. Census.

Neighborhood Indicator Value Ranksort ascending
College Hills 97.0% 99
Collegeville 96.4% 98
Kingston 95.8% 97
Inglenook 94.3% 95
Graymont 94.3% 95
Harriman Park 94.2% 94
Industrial Center 94.1% 93
Airport Highlands 93.7% 92
Brownsville Heights 93.3% 91
Roebuck Springs 93.1% 90
Jones Valley 92.9% 89
Bush Hills 92.7% 88
Fairmont 92.6% 87
Ensley Highlands 92.3% 86
Grasselli Heights 91.9% 85
Fairview 91.6% 84
Powderly 90.9% 83
Gate City 90.7% 81
Hooper City 90.7% 81
Crestwood North 90.5% 78
Roebuck 90.5% 78
Norwood 90.5% 78
Brown Springs 90.2% 76
Smithfield 90.2% 76
East Thomas 89.7% 75
Enon Ridge 89.6% 74
Roosevelt 89.5% 72
Woodland Park 89.5% 72
Wahouma 89.3% 71
Green Acres 89.0% 70
Belview Heights 88.7% 68
Riley 88.7% 68
Oakwood Place 88.1% 67
Tarpley City 87.8% 65
North Avondale 87.8% 65
Central Pratt 87.7% 64
Wylam 87.6% 62
West End Manor 87.6% 62
Germania Park 87.0% 61
North East Lake 86.8% 60
South Pratt 86.4% 59
South Titusville 86.3% 58
East Birmingham 86.0% 57
Hillman 85.9% 56
Druid Hills 85.7% 53
Central Park 85.7% 53
West Goldwire 85.7% 53
Oak Ridge 85.6% 52
Crestwood South 84.8% 51
Evergreen 84.3% 50
Garden Highlands 83.8% 49
Oak Ridge Park 83.2% 48
East Avondale 83.0% 46
Redmont Park 83.0% 46
North Titusville 82.8% 45
Rising - West Princeton 82.3% 43
Sherman Heights 82.3% 43
Huffman 81.3% 40
South East Lake 81.3% 40
Arlington - West End 81.3% 40
Highland Park 81.2% 39
Crestline 79.9% 38
Thomas 79.1% 35
West Brownville 79.1% 35
Ensley 79.1% 35
Forest Park 78.1% 34
Sun Valley 77.7% 33
Southside 77.6% 32
Woodlawn 77.1% 31
Acipco-Finley 74.7% 30
Pine Knoll Vista 74.6% 27
East Lake 74.6% 27
Brummitt Heights 74.6% 27
Spring Lake 74.0% 26
North Birmingham 72.4% 25
East Brownville 72.2% 24
Killough Springs 72.0% 22
Eastwood 72.0% 22
Zion City 71.9% 21
Hillman Park 70.6% 20
Fountain Heights 70.5% 18
Mason City 70.5% 18
Five Points South 69.4% 17
South Woodlawn 69.3% 16
Dolomite 66.7% 15
Glen Iris 65.1% 14
Maple Grove 64.9% 13
Penfield Park 64.6% 12
Smithfield Estates 60.5% 11
Liberty Highlands 60.2% 10
Bridlewood 55.4% 9
Apple Valley 54.8% 8
Sandusky 54.4% 7
North Pratt 51.5% 6
Echo Highlands 44.5% 5
Tuxedo 44.1% 4
Central City 42.1% 3
Overton 12.7% 2
Oxmoor 11.9% 1

Key Citations:
1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Social Determinants of Health. Published 2011. Accessed December 27, 2013. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2011/rwjf70451.
2. Elliott L, Arbes S, Harvey ES, Lee RC, Salo PM, Cohn RD, London SJ, Zeldin DC. Dust Weight and Asthma Prevalence in the National Survey of Lead and Allergens in Housing (NSLAH). Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115(2): 215–220. Published online 2006 November 7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9412 PMCID: PMC1817708.
3. Cohn RD, Arbes SJ, Jaramillo R, Reid, LH, Zeldin, DC. 2006. National Prevalence and Exposure Risk for Cockroach Allergen in U.S. Households. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114(4): 522–526. Published online 2005 November 15. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8561.
4. Lefebvre S, Montgomery P, Michel I, Warren C, Larose T, Kauppi C. The role of public health inspectors in maintaining housing in northern and rural communities: recommendations to support public health practice. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;103(2):84-9.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Healthy Housing Reference Manual. 2006. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nceh/publication/books/housing/housing.htm
6. National Center for Healthy Housing. Housing Interventions and Health: A Review of the Evidence. 2009. Accessed December 27, 2012. Available at: www.nchh.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=2lvaEDNBldU%3d%tabid=229.